close
Another interesting article regarding deductive v.s. inductive, though it is in science field.
An interesting reference.

In science, inductive reasoning, or working from examples to discover abstract concepts, is often considered superior to deductive reasoning, or using abstract concepts to make sense of examples. However, a recent study found that the most famous scientific discoveries have been made through the use of deductive reasoning. This confirms the alternative view that deductive reasoning is actually more successful than inductive reasoning in advancing science.

 

The conclusion above is based on which of the following assumptions?

 

(A) More famous scientific discoveries advance science more than less famous scientific discoveries do.

 

(B) The most famous scientific discoveries probably employ both inductive and deductive reasoning.

 

(C) Using abstract concepts to make sense of single examples is an inappropriate way to make scientific discoveries.

 

(D) The most famous scientists employ deductive reasoning in the majority of their scientific work.

 

(E) The discoveries made by working scientists can be made just as easily using either inductive or deductive reasoning.

This article is adopted from the following web site:

http://www.beatthegmat.com/inductive-learning-vs-deductive-learning-t36273.html

arrow
arrow
    全站熱搜
    創作者介紹
    創作者 寄生草莓 的頭像
    寄生草莓

    寄生草莓的英文俱樂部

    寄生草莓 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()